Rethinking Our Thought Processes in a Shifting Landscape
Written on
Chapter 1: The Importance of Independent Thinking
In today's world, we often wonder: how many of us truly think for ourselves? On the opening page of his recent book, Rethinking Thinking: Problem-solving from Sun Tzu to Google (Imprint Academic, UK £14.95 / US $29.90, April 2022), British philosopher Martin Cohen highlights a troubling reality: in a time of growing totalitarianism, governments are limiting our autonomy, forcing entire populations into narrowly defined roles and routines.
This is particularly disheartening, given that humans, the so-called 'thinking species,' often fail to live up to that designation. The capacity for thought—envisioning new possibilities and discovering innovative solutions to age-old problems—is our greatest asset. Yet, many seem to squander this potential.
Cohen's work encourages a departure from conventional 'logical thinking' that philosophers and psychologists often champion. Instead, he advocates for the cultivation of creative thought, urging us to focus on what genuinely matters. His goal is to inspire individuals to think not just reactively, but actively, using unique strategies that yield positive results.
In the digital age, where answers are readily available at our fingertips, it is all too easy to disengage our minds. We risk allowing our cognitive faculties to atrophy when we let others do the thinking for us.
Cohen's Rethinking Thinking serves as a rich source of intellectual nourishment in a culture suffering from a dearth of genuine thought. To paraphrase Shakespeare and Rousseau, while thought is inherently free, society today often binds it with constraints.
One of the most poignant sections of Cohen's book appears in the penultimate chapter, where he meticulously critiques the flawed reasoning behind the medical and political responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis underscores the urgent necessity for individuals worldwide to reevaluate their perspectives on government and experts, especially regarding their readiness to infringe on civil liberties.
Cohen asserts that the pandemic experience is an ideal starting point for questioning whether our reactions are based on rational, evidence-informed reasoning or are merely driven by irrational fears. He notes that spikes in reported COVID-19 cases were often presented without context, failing to correlate with the increased number of tests conducted. This misrepresentation, coupled with the ambiguous nature of test results, reveals that political agendas can heavily influence scientific discourse.
This leads to the notion that a significant shift in beliefs was not anchored in carefully analyzed data but rather stemmed from a mindless acceptance of prevailing narratives. This phenomenon created an 'information cascade,' where the opinions of others overshadowed personal judgment, illustrating a contemporary cognitive pitfall often termed 'garbage in, garbage out.'
Misinterpreting evidence to suit preconceived notions is a pervasive cognitive error. Throughout the pandemic, the prevailing mindset equated urgency with extreme measures, resulting in lockdowns and mandates that often ignored established scientific consensus regarding mask efficacy against viral transmission. Cohen provocatively questions why, despite the annual toll of various respiratory viruses, this particular virus prompted such drastic societal changes.
In Cohen's view, policymakers' loss aversion—prioritizing immediate health threats over long-term societal impacts—fueled decisions that disregarded economic stability and individual freedoms. This fear-driven mentality can lead to disastrous collective choices.
Moreover, mainstream media often marginalizes dissenting voices, promoting a singular narrative that mirrors the cautious approach of scholarly journals, which frequently stifle alternative research and viewpoints. Cohen warns against the dangers of over-relying on perceived scientific consensus, advocating for an openness to uncertainty and ambiguity that is essential for true intellectual progress.
While Cohen doesn't delve deeply into funding influences on scientific opinions, he raises an important point: one must scrutinize the financial backing behind expert advice to uncover potential biases and conflicts of interest.
Stifling Competing Views
Cohen invokes philosopher Thomas Kuhn's concept of scientific communities behaving more like an insular priesthood than objective scholars, suppressing alternative viewpoints. The reverence for established scientific consensus can create an environment where new ideas are dismissed, potentially stifling innovation and understanding.
The pandemic illustrated a form of 'mass formation,' a collective psychological phenomenon where people become so consumed by a singular narrative that they sacrifice their freedoms and critical thinking. Cohen cites four essential conditions for this mindset: widespread loneliness, a sense of meaninglessness, anxiety, and frustration. These factors can lead to a state where individuals feel utterly powerless.
To counteract this trend, Cohen emphasizes the importance of dissent and non-violent resistance. Such efforts are crucial to preventing totalitarian systems from devolving into inhumane practices. Unfortunately, he notes that genuine critical thought and pragmatic discourse are alarmingly scarce in contemporary society.
A culture that values effective strategies and democratic debate once enabled remarkable achievements, such as NASA's space program. In our current era, cultivating such skills is both more critical and increasingly challenging.
Martin Cohen, a specialist in the philosophy of science and political philosophy, has an extensive background in both academia and authorship. His most notable works include 101 Philosophy Problems and Critical Thinking Skills for Dummies, both of which have garnered significant acclaim.
Adam Grant | Why You Should Rethink A Lot More Than You Do - YouTube
In this engaging talk, Adam Grant encourages viewers to challenge their assumptions and reconsider their perspectives, emphasizing the importance of flexible thinking in an ever-evolving world.
Adam Grant: Think Again - The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know - YouTube
In this insightful presentation, Adam Grant discusses the value of recognizing our limitations and the power that comes from embracing uncertainty and the unknown.
'Gonna change my way of thinking / Make myself a different set of rules / Going to put my good foot forward / Stop being influenced by fools.' - Bob Dylan, Slow Train Coming, 1979.
You can subscribe to Medium by using this link.