Navigating the Creative Application Maze with AI Assistance
Written on
Chapter 1: The Burden of Application Processes
In a world where time is limited, and the demands of modern life are unyielding, I find myself frustrated by the myriad of obstacles presented by creative application processes.
"I'm sorry if my approach doesn't align with your expectations, but with only ninety years on this planet, I refuse to jump through endless hoops."
Technology, when it simplifies my life, deserves my appreciation. One such transformative tool is ChatGPT, which has significantly reduced my workload. As a creative professional, I often spend considerable time seeking funding and opportunities to transform my ideas into art. This is a common experience for those who lack financial privilege, leading to a noticeable drop-off in working-class creatives who need to manage basic living expenses.
This disparity explains the prevalent presence of individuals from affluent backgrounds in the arts. The arts community is increasingly dominated by those who attended private schools, which account for only about 7% of the population, yet their representation in culture and politics is disproportionate.
With hopes for a Labour Government that might address these inequities, I anticipate both enthusiasm and resistance, particularly from media representatives who often hail from similar privileged backgrounds.
Section 1.1: The Application Overload
Balancing my creative pursuits with my hospital job and other commitments can be exhausting. Therefore, I have chosen to delegate my application tasks.
All my cover letters are generated by ChatGPT, allowing me to edit them swiftly and efficiently. I can no longer afford to waste hours on the trivial demands imposed by overzealous gatekeepers.
The increasing number of requirements to secure an interview is baffling and seems to stem from misguided Human Resources strategies. In addition to providing a full CV, I'm often faced with repetitive questions about my experiences—information already detailed in my application.
Following this, I'm typically asked about my expectations from the program or my future aspirations, all confined within a strict word limit. Why impose such constraints on applicants? If my time is wasted on irrelevant questions, the least you could do is allow me to express my thoughts fully.
The demands don’t end there. I am usually required to submit a cover letter and references, followed by an extensive monitoring form for demographic data. This focus on demographics often feels excessive, and I prefer to opt-out of such inquiries.
Section 1.2: The Insanity of Demographic Monitoring
In the arts sector, many programs target specific demographics, which can limit opportunities based on identity. A glance at past recipients often reveals an implicit alignment with the program's values. Instead of this convoluted system, I propose a simpler approach: one writing task with selections based solely on quality.
The current system feels like mere manipulation to achieve desired outcomes rather than genuine inclusivity, ultimately compromising artistic quality.
Applying for various schemes can consume between two to eight hours, often for opportunities I realistically have little chance of securing. The responses typically arrive months later, often with vague rejections that offer no constructive feedback.
For instance, a recent application to the BBC yielded a standard rejection, leaving me unperturbed but frustrated by the expectation to undertake extensive work for no compensation. The decision-makers typically enjoy stable salaries while sipping coffee, making questionable choices about programming.
Chapter 2: The Role of AI in Application Processes
The first video showcases an experiment where the creator attempts to convince advanced AI NPCs of their simulated existence. This thought-provoking exploration offers insight into artificial intelligence's role in our understanding of reality and creativity.
For instance, if you apply for a program like the BBC's, you need to be a published playwright or hold a TV writing credit—qualifications that suggest financial success from writing. Thus, why not provide a stipend for the application process?
The idea of compensating creatives for the time spent on applications might seem outrageous, but it could lead to a reduction in unnecessary hurdles. If organizations were accountable for the workload they impose, they might reconsider their application requirements.
Currently, I rely on ChatGPT for crafting my application letters, followed by a brief review from me. My writing samples speak volumes, and if they can’t be bothered to read my CV, I don’t feel obliged to answer their questions thoroughly.
Ultimately, I have other priorities. I aim to shift the odds in my favor by increasing the number of applications I submit.
The second video focuses on leveraging AI automation to create viral text message stories, targeting TikTok creators seeking rewards. This guide illustrates the potential of AI in enhancing creative storytelling and engaging audiences effectively.
Reflecting on the current landscape of creativity, I can't help but think about the mediocre productions that find their way into our screens. Often, they are crafted by individuals with renowned familial connections—an unfair advantage that undermines the meritocratic ideals of creative industries.
For now, ChatGPT serves as my ally in non-creative writing, a means to combat the treatment I receive as a creative professional.