Revisiting America's Controversial War Strategies in Japan
Written on
Chapter 1: Contextualizing the Conflict
As you delve into this article, it's essential to approach it as a historical account rather than a political debate. Set aside any nationalistic sentiments. In times of war, all factions often commit atrocities. While one side may have perpetrated more severe offenses, this does not excuse the actions of the other.
The image below illustrates the aftermath of destruction in Tokyo, which was once the world's most densely populated city. The vast spaces visible between the concrete structures were once filled with homes and businesses, primarily made from wood and bamboo, turning them into death traps during the firebombing raids of March 9-10, 1945.
Before the onset of 1945, Japan's defeat was a foregone conclusion. The United States Navy's blockade had effectively halted Japanese factories, with remaining oil resources primarily allocated for air defense. Despite this, the Japanese High Command remained resolute in their belief that they could repel any American invasion. Meanwhile, the U.S. had grown weary of conflict, with projected casualties from a potential invasion estimated in the millions for both sides.
Section 1.1: The Principle of Warfare
Sun Tzu once stated, "When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard." In 1943, President Roosevelt's demand for unconditional surrender contradicted this principle. This ultimatum left Japan's leadership with the grim options of either total defeat or execution, eliminating any chance for diplomatic resolution.
Subsection 1.1.1: Attempts for Peace
Kevin Farran's response notes that even prior to the firebombings, there were efforts to negotiate peace. Notably, Hirota Koki, Japan's prime minister during the war's declaration, sought peace terms despite his subsequent execution.
Section 1.2: Shifting Strategies
In early 1945, the U.S. Army Air Force and Navy had been conducting precision bombing missions targeting Japanese ports and industrial sites. However, the high-altitude bombing capabilities of the time were fraught with inaccuracies. Major General Curtis LeMay recognized the inadequacy of these tactics and shifted strategies dramatically.
Chapter 2: The Firebombing Campaign
The first video titled "Was Hiroshima A War Crime?" discusses the ethical implications surrounding the bombings. The narrative explores the complexities of wartime decisions and their lasting effects on history.
In March 1945, General LeMay, faced with the reality of limited destruction from previous bombing campaigns, chose to alter his approach. He ordered the B-29 bombers to carry napalm instead of traditional munitions. The first raid commenced on March 10, resulting in a catastrophic firestorm that engulfed Tokyo and devastated the city.
The second video titled "Were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings War Crimes?" delves deeper into the moral questions surrounding the bombings and the human cost associated with these actions.
The firebombing of Tokyo resulted in the destruction of approximately 16 square miles of the city, with death toll estimates ranging from 100,000 to 200,000. This was considerably greater than the casualties inflicted by the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were reported at 140,000 and 79,000 respectively.
Despite the devastation, the firebombing campaign persisted until the atomic bombings in August, with a combined civilian death toll estimated at around 387,000.
Conclusion: The Legacy of War
While the atrocities committed during the war are undeniable, it is crucial to recognize that these actions do not excuse the war crimes of the opposing side. The legacy of LeMay's strategies con